Assouline & Berlowe, P.A. reported that the Ninth Circuit held that a single penalty applies.
Public source
Publisher name
Public post
The Ninth Circuit held that a single penalty applies.
Company
Assouline & Berlowe, P.A.
The Business Law Firm
- Location
- Miami, US
- Company size
- 11–50 employees
About Assouline & Berlowe, P.A.
Assouline & Berlowe is a business litigation and transactional law firm serving the business needs of local, national, and international clients. Now in its second decade, our attorneys have worked on a broad range of business matters for wide ranging clients. The Firm consists of a dedicated team of recognized professionals with years of business and technology law experience. We remain true to our initial mission: exceed client expectations and provide client-specific legal services. The Firm’s main Practice Areas are: Business Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Creditors Rights and Bankruptcy, Corporate and Finance Intellectual Property, International Law and Arbitration, Labor and Employment, and Real Estate.
See moreDiscover more
Similar signals
Similar public activity from other companies.
Legal & Regulatory
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP
Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP client alert: The Fifth Circuit issued a new rule that could reshape how platforms and aggregators think about liability following the Ninth Circuit's server test for copyright's public display right.
Legal & Regulatory
Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Lowenstein Sandler LLP's Jason Gould, Scott McBride, Mikayla Berliner, and Matthew Wester explained that the 11th Circuit upheld the False Claims Act's qui tam provisions against an appointments clause challenge, joining four other federal appeals courts in rejecting this constitutional argument.
Legal & Regulatory
Holland & Knight LLP
Holland & Knight LLP made a decision with oral arguments on a similar case coming up in October in front of SCOTUS.
Legal & Regulatory
Phillips & Cohen LLP
Phillips & Cohen LLP issued a statement regarding the ruling in Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, where the Eleventh Circuit joined four other circuits in holding that the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act do not violate the Appointments Clause of Article II of the Constitution.
Legal & Regulatory
Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP