Beale & Co published an article discussing the decision by the Outer House in Entexol Ltd v Sked Construction Ltd, where the court held that there was no breach of natural justice when an adjudicator concluded that time was at large as part of rejecting a contractor’s defence.
Public source
Publisher name
Public post
The Outer House has reaffirmed its reluctance to interfere with adjudicators’ decisions, holding in Entexol Ltd v Sked Construction Ltd that there was no breach of natur…
Company
Beale & Co
International Construction and Insurance Law Specialists
- Industry
- Law Practice
- Location
- London, GB
- Company size
- 201–500 employees
About Beale & Co
Originally founded in 1838 we have over 180 years’ experience providing specialist legal advice to the construction, engineering, infrastructure and insurance sectors. With around 100 lawyers spread across offices in London, Bristol, Glasgow, Dublin, Dubai and Toronto we deliver an innovative and international service to our clients wherever they may be. In an ever-changing legal market it has never been more important to maintain a high quality specialist service. We have a reputation for working to the highest standards and have thrived in response to a demand that has grown exponentially over the past 30 years. Our approach is always consistent: we understand the often technically complex issues, identify solutions and implement an appropriate strategy to achieve a successful outcome. Our lawyers are experts in their field and have a genuine understanding of the industries in which they operate. Moreover, our relative size combined with tight lines of communication makes us extremely agile and able to respond quickly and efficiently to demand. This means that the client gets a high quality and cost-efficient end-to-end service – all the way from briefing to resolution.
See moreDiscover more
Similar signals
Similar public activity from other companies.
Legal & Regulatory
Hill Dickinson LLP
Hill Dickinson LLP published an article examining the case of Premier Modular Ltd v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust in EWHC 1404 (TCC) where the court refused to enforce a £1.65 million adjudication award after finding the adjudicator had decided the dispute on a basis neither party had advanced.
Legal & Regulatory
Hawkswell Kilvington Construction Law
Hawkswell Kilvington Construction Law published a case bulletin regarding the legal case Oakland Wantage Care Home Ltd v Stepnell Ltd [2026] where the TCC considered whether a work-in-progress final account could become the Final Statement triggering JCT D&B conclusivity provisions.
Legal & Regulatory
Novus Resolve
Novus Resolve published a summary and analysis of the Technology and Construction Court decision in Premier Modular Ltd v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 1404 (TCC)
Legal & Regulatory
Lexilio
Lexilio noted that the TCC refused to enforce a £2 million adjudication decision in High Tech Construction Ltd v WLP Trading and Marketing Ltd because the parties could not agree a JCT contract ever existed.
Legal & Regulatory
Shepherd and Wedderburn