Hawkswell Kilvington Construction Law noted that a contractor issued a proper Final Statement two years after an employer disputed an early draft final statement under JCT D&B provisions.
Public source
Publisher name
Public post
An important read for anyone managing final accounts on a JCT D&B project. The employer in this case disputed an early draft final statement, but that objection didn't h…
Company
Hawkswell Kilvington Construction Law
Beyond Law Group’s specialist construction and engineering practice.
- Industry
- Legal Services
- Location
- Leeds, GB
- Company size
- 11–50 employees
About Hawkswell Kilvington Construction Law
Beyond Law Group’s specialist award-winning construction law firm, whose sole focus is on providing legal services to the construction and engineering industries. Although our main offices are in Leeds, London and Manchester, our clients are spread throughout the UK and internationally. Our team of professional and highly experienced lawyers have an up-to-date and in-depth knowledge of the latest legal developments, and always adopt a pragmatic, commercial and cost-effective approach. We offer a personal service and a high level of partner involvement. Our contentious team is renowned for understanding objectives and developing effective, practical, and commercial dispute resolution strategies. Where formal disputes occur, the team have vast experience of dealing with construction related disputes under all forms of construction contracts (including JCT, NEC and FIDIC) and in a wide range of forums, including: • adjudication • litigation • arbitration • settlement by way of direct negotiation • early neutral evaluation • mediation We have also successfully enforced and resisted enforcement of many adjudication decisions through the Technology and Construction Court. Our non-contentious team is known for providing a straight-forward approach to project documentation, always with a view to minimising client risk. We support clients by drafting, advising on and negotiating amendments to all standard forms of construction contracts, including JCT, NEC and FIDIC, along with more bespoke forms of contracts. The team also deals with: • professional appointments • novation agreements • letters of intent • performance bonds • parent company guarantees • framework and joint venture agreements and warranties • procurement options • project reset documentation, including deeds of variation Visit our website to find out more about the services we offer.
See moreLatest activity
Latest activity from Hawkswell Kilvington Construction Law
3 signals
Presence & Recognition
Hawkswell Kilvington Construction Law is hosting an Annual Construction Law Update event in November with a limited number of places available.
Legal & Regulatory
Hawkswell Kilvington Construction Law published a case bulletin regarding the legal case Oakland Wantage Care Home Ltd v Stepnell Ltd [2026] where the TCC considered whether a work-in-progress final account could become the Final Statement triggering JCT D&B conclusivity provisions.
Discover more
Similar signals
Similar public activity from other companies.
Legal & Regulatory
Novus Resolve
Novus Resolve published a summary and analysis of the Technology and Construction Court decision in Premier Modular Ltd v Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust [2026] EWHC 1404 (TCC)
Legal & Regulatory
Lexilio
Lexilio noted that the TCC refused to enforce a £2 million adjudication decision in High Tech Construction Ltd v WLP Trading and Marketing Ltd because the parties could not agree a JCT contract ever existed.
Legal & Regulatory
Selborne Chambers
Selborne Chambers noted that a recent Technology and Construction Court decision highlighted that agreed deadlines are not negotiable targets and that a party who defaults without good reason may find itself unable to defend the claim.
Legal & Regulatory
Beale & Co
Beale & Co published an article discussing the decision by the Outer House in Entexol Ltd v Sked Construction Ltd, where the court held that there was no breach of natural justice when an adjudicator concluded that time was at large as part of rejecting a contractor’s defence.
Legal & Regulatory
Hill Dickinson LLP