Melick & Porter, LLP noted that a recent Fourth Circuit decision highlights why consistency, documentation, and careful investigations can make a big difference for employers when making disciplinary decisions in the context of discrimination complaints.
Public source
Publisher name
Public post
When alleged workplace misconduct and a protected activity occur at the same time, the line between appropriate discipline and unwelcome retaliation can become difficult…
Company
Melick & Porter, LLP
More than 40 Years of Trusted Legal Counsel.
- Industry
- Law Practice
- Location
- Boston, US
- Company size
- 51–200 employees
About Melick & Porter, LLP
We know our way around a courtroom. We are a firm of trial attorneys. We represent corporations, hospitals, insurance companies, employers and professionals in New England and nationally. We provide talent and expertise to help you solve your problems quickly. Working with accomplished trial counsel produces advantageous results. Our clients obtain better outcomes because we are ready for trial with a winning theme and the evidence to back it up. Our track record of success before juries and on appeal speaks volumes. At Melick & Porter, LLP, we try cases. It’s who we are, it’s what we do.
See moreDiscover more
Similar signals
Similar public activity from other companies.
Legal & Regulatory
Bowles Rice LLP
Bowles Rice LLP attorney Julie A. Moore published a breakdown of a recent Fourth Circuit decision regarding reassignment to a vacant position and indefinite leave for employers handling disability accommodations.
Legal & Regulatory
Foley & Lardner LLP
Foley & Lardner LLP colleague Anne Sekel explored the key takeaways for employers and HR professionals regarding religious accommodation claims in Bergin v. New York State Unified Court System, emphasizing whether an employer acted out of a desire to avoid providing an accommodation.
Legal & Regulatory
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Dinsmore & Shohl LLP noted that the Second Circuit recently rejected the NLRB's 2022 framework for evaluating employer dress code policies, holding that employer interests must be balanced against employees' Section 7 rights rather than applying a strict scrutiny-like standard.
Legal & Regulatory
Bodman PLC
Bodman PLC Workplace Law Group noted that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reaffirmed that employees who engage in protected activity under anti-discrimination laws are not immune from discipline if they separately violate workplace rules in the recent decision in Crisp v. Scioto Ambulance Dist.
Legal & Regulatory
Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel LLP